Argyll and Bute Council Afraid of Mild and Polite Criticism, Little Girls, Pictures of Tater Tots

Politics & Current Events

Americans are immersed in bitter arguments over federalized healthcare and multiple-front wars and kill lists and complex federal taxes. Much of the national dialogue orbits the question of how much central government is too much — of whether or not power should be taken from the hands of the feds and returned to the hands of states and localities.

The focus on that argument leads us to lose sight of the fact that local governments can be just as supremely thuggish, priggish, nosy, defensive, reactionary, and muddle-headed as national governments, just on a small scale. I'd venture to say that local government idiocy is a popular theme on this blog.

This is a story of local government idiocy. It's not American — but it's emblematic of why local governments can be the fire to national government's frying pan.

This story is about a local government that put a halt to a citizen taking pictures in a government facility.

Was it someone taking pictures of police misconduct, or photographing public buildings feared to be targets of terrorism?

No. It was a little girl, taking pictures of her lunch, at school.

The little girl is nine-year-old Martha Payne of Lochgilphead in Argyll, Scotland. Martha has a blog. The blog is one of those sweet things in life that makes me uncritically delighted without worrying about descending into sentimentality. The blog is called NeverSeconds, and Martha started it because she didn't particularly like the meals served at her local public school. Most nine-year-olds — heck, most adults — might have started a blog that was crass, sloppy, vulgar, or otherwise modern in outlook to deal with that sentiment. Martha — who goes by "Veg" on the blog — didn't. Her blog is funny, rather polite, full of sharp observation, and with neat and painstaking reviews:

Today's meal was on the menu as Cheeseburger and ice cream/biscuit but as you can see I got an ice lolly. I prefer ice cream. I wish they had stuck to the menu. I did get 2 croquettes though only 3 pieces of cucumber when I said no thanks to the peas.

Food-o-meter- 7/10
Mouthfuls- eating and counting and chatting to friends is hard!
Courses- main/dessert
Health Rating- 2/10
Price- £2
Pieces of hair- 0!

The good thing about this blog is Dad understands why I am hungry when I get home. Today he made a Banana Loaf, shame I don't like bananas, see I am not perfect!

Each such entry has a closely-focused picture of the lunch, which Martha takes with her camera. Martha does not excoriate the food or the people who make it. She's far more polite about food than my kids.

There are also observations of a child's life. Perhaps her parents help her write, perhaps not. She has a gift for description:

I played a clarinet solo in a concert today after school to celebrate the end of my first year learning to play. I was so stiff with nerves at the end of the performance that I had to take a moment before I could walk away. I still had butterflies afterwards when I played in our small group of five. The concert was in the lunch hall and it was packed and everyone clapped and cheered a lot.

Word spread. Eventually NeverSeconds went viral. Martha handled it with aplomb. She began communicating with students across the world and adding their pictures and descriptions of their lunches, and asking her increasing audience to donate so other kids could eat, all without losing the essential sweetness of her posts.

You know what happens next.

Goodbye.
This morning in maths I got taken out of class by my head teacher and taken to her office. I was told that I could not take any more photos of my school dinners because of a headline in a newspaper today.

I only write my blog not newspapers and I am sad I am no longer allowed to take photos. I will miss sharing and rating my school dinners and I’ll miss seeing the dinners you send me too. I don’t think I will be able to finish raising enough money for a kitchen for Mary’s Meals either.

Goodbye,
VEG

Martha's father confirmed the source of the decision was not the school itself:

I contacted Argyll and Bute Council when Martha told me what happened at school today and they told me it was their decision to ban Martha’s photography.

So. There's that danger to good order dealt with.

I confess I know very little about the council system in the United Kingdom. I can say I can't recall hearing a good thing about it, only many bad. It seems to be a part of the descent of that noble land, to which we owe our common heritage of freedom, into freakish statism. Not that America is in a position to throw the first stone — or even so much as the first grain of sand. The mote is lodged firmly in our unseeing eye.

Why did the Argyll and Bute Council decide to forbid Martha to take pictures of her lunch? We don't know. Perhaps it was some new ludicrous zero tolerance for cameras policy. Perhaps the council felt that, even though Martha took pictures of her tray, she might possibly take pictures of a classmate and invade their privacy and inspire a complaint. Perhaps pictures are seen as a security risk. Perhaps they thought she was being insolent. Perhaps they didn't like the tone of the latest newspaper story about the school lunches under their control. Perhaps they felt that if Martha could write about government-supplied lunches in government-run schools, other children might be inspired to write about the government and how it runs things, and grow up thinking that doing so is something proper and admirable to do. Perhaps their sensibilities were offended. They may eventually back off in embarrassment with a vague excuse, or they may stand their ground with some justification. Neither can be trusted.

NeverSeconds was an opportunity for Martha to learn about writing regularly and being responsible for a publication. It was an opportunity for her to show other kids that the could express themselves as well. It was an opportunity to learn about nutrition. It was an opportunity to connect with, and learn about, people in other places and cultures.

But this is a learning opportunity, too. Martha and her fans — both young and old — learned something about government, and how to view it.

The lesson, offered by the short and heretofore pleasant arc of Martha's blogging career, is that the government (and the sort of people who aspire to be in it) feels entitled to dictate such things based on a wide variety of reasons. The government thinks that it ought to be able to tell little girls not to photograph their lunch, in the name of good order. The government things that it knows a great many things better than you and I do, and that it is right and fit that they be empowered to instruct us to do it their way. The lesson, preached often here, is this: the government is not your friend. The people in it are not your friends. They smile. But they are there because they are the sort of people who like telling other people what to do, people they do not know, people over whom they have no moral claim, regarding things that are not justly any business of theirs. That is what they do. That is who they are.

This all happens at our sufferance. One hopes that sufferance is limited.

If, like me, you don't think much of this, perhaps you could let them know.

Hat Tip To Many Sources, Including Andy Lewis and Wired.

UPDATED: Hooray for our awesome readers, who updated the story whilst I slept. They report, and provide links, that the Council has retreated, that donations to Martha's charity have surged, and the "leader" of the Council has issued a conciliatory statement. Our readers were too quick for the Council, though, and caught their defiant, entitled, censorship-apologizing first draft:

Argyll and Bute Council wholly refutes the unwarranted attacks on its schools catering service which culminated in national press headlines which have led catering staff to fear for their jobs. The Council has directly avoided any criticism of anyone involved in the ‘never seconds’ blog for obvious reasons …

In particular, the photographic images uploaded appear to only represent a fraction of the choices available to pupils, so a decision has been made by the council to stop photos being taken in the school canteen.

There have been discussions between senior council staff and Martha’s father however, despite an acknowledgement that the media coverage has produced these unwarranted attacks, he intimated that he would continue with the blog.

The council has had no complaints for the last two years about the quality of school meals other than one from the Payne family

Those are only fragments, thanks to commenter Clark; if someone has a screenshot or full version, I would be very grateful to see it.

The original statement is the honest expression of the attitude of the people who work for the Council, and for government everywhere, issued before a higher-up stepped in and judged that power must yield to prudence in this instance. The Council's initial statement demonstrates a sick entitlement by government to be free of criticism, a belief that they may impose their concept of "fairness" upon citizen speech, a sense that government actors ought to be protected from the uninformed opinions of the great unwashed, lest their fee-fees be hurt and good order disrupted. That, again, is the lesson here. These people are not your friends. But there's a more hopeful lesson as well: by publicizing government misbehavior, we can occasionally shame them into respecting the rights of citizens.

Second Edit: Thanks to reader Jay, who has the entire original defensive statement in the comments.

Last 5 posts by Ken White

26 Comments

25 Comments

  1. Jingles  •  Jun 14, 2012 @10:52 pm

    Their complaint submission page is here if you don't use the Twitters.

  2. Talisker  •  Jun 14, 2012 @10:52 pm

    In addition to giving the Argyll and Bute Council what for, I'd strongly encourage everyone to give a few bucks to the charity Martha is supporting: http://www.justgiving.com/neverseconds

  3. ttl  •  Jun 15, 2012 @3:44 am
  4. C. S. P. Schofield  •  Jun 15, 2012 @4:36 am

    Clearly there is nothing wrong with this council that deep fat frying wouldn't solve.

    Twerps.

    Insufferable nobodies like this in public life make the aristocrats of old look good, which I wouldn't have believed possible if I hadn't seen it.

  5. David  •  Jun 15, 2012 @4:43 am

    Free Martha Payne's Camera! Free Martha Payne's Camera! Free Martha Payne's Camera! …

  6. Luke  •  Jun 15, 2012 @6:03 am

    Wow. I am trying to imagine the thought process here. Did they really think that somehow banning a nine year old girl of taking pictures of her crappy school lunches would garner less media attention?

    On the flip side: 53 out of 59 pages of donations to Mary's Meals were all from today.

  7. Ruth  •  Jun 15, 2012 @6:05 am

    They've lifted the ban, sounds like SOMEONE has an ounce of sense…. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-glasgow-west-18454800

    (seriously, what kid LIKES they're school prepared lunch? I never did. If she's giving them reasonably positive ratings they oughta be proud!)

  8. Clark  •  Jun 15, 2012 @6:15 am

    @ttl:
    > a response from the council

    ————-

    Argyll and Bute Council wholly refutes the unwarranted attacks on its schools catering service which culminated in national press headlines which have led catering staff to fear for their jobs. The Council has directly avoided any criticism of anyone involved in the ‘never seconds’ blog for obvious reasons …

    In particular, the photographic images uploaded appear to only represent a fraction of the choices available to pupils, so a decision has been made by the council to stop photos being taken in the school canteen.

    There have been discussions between senior council staff and Martha’s father however, despite an acknowledgement that the media coverage has produced these unwarranted attacks, he intimated that he would continue with the blog.

    The council has had no complaints for the last two years about the quality of school meals other than one from the Payne family

    ———–

    Translation:

    * We could have attacked the girl, but we didn't. There, aren't we awesome for our forebearance?

    * No one has ever criticized us. …except when they did, it really stung. Therefore we will make sure that no one ever criticizes us again.

    * Because this student was so cheap as to not buy EVERY entree EVERY day and upload pictures, she's being unfair to us.

    * Because the solution for speech we disagree with is more speech, we're going to start live blogging ALL of our menu choices every day, so that customers and their parents can see what good food we provide. Ha! Just kidding! No, we're the government. We're just going to make speech we disagree with illegal.

  9. Shadow  •  Jun 15, 2012 @6:26 am

    Regular readers will be glad to know that the leader of Argyll & Bute Council has been on the BBC Radio 4 lunchtime news programme, and said that the attempt to silence a nine year old blogger was a mistake and that the ban on photography has been revoked.

  10. UsernameNumber  •  Jun 15, 2012 @6:41 am

    Whoa… earlier this morning the council tweeted a link to their statement on the incident. When I opened it, it was a defensive and and rather flimsy attempt to say that they did it all for the sake of their poor kitchen employees who "feared for their jobs" after Nevermeals was mentioned in a local newspaper, as though the paper somehow controls hiring and firing for neighborhood schools.

    I just reloaded the page, and they have very abruptly changed their tune. The original statement has been replaced with this (quoting below in case it poofs again):

    """
    Statement from Cllr Roddy McCuish, Leader of Argyll and Bute Council

    "There is no place for censorship in this Council and never will be whilst I am leader. I have advised senior officers that this Administration intends to clarify the Council's policy position in regard to taking photos in schools. I have therefore requested senior officials to consider immediately withdrawing the ban on pictures from the school dining hall until a report can be considered by Elected Members. This will allow the continuation of the "Neverseconds" blog written by an enterprising and imaginative pupil, Martha Payne which has also raised lots of money for charity.

    But we all must also accept that there is absolutely no place for the type of inaccurate and abusive attack on our catering and dining hall staff, such as we saw in one newspaper yesterday which considerably inflamed the situation. That, of course, was not the fault of the blog, but of the paper.

    We need to find a united way forward so I am going to bring together our catering staff, the pupils, councillors and council officials – to ensure that the council continues to provide healthy, nutrious and attractive school meals. That "School Meals Summit" will take place later this summer.

    I will also meet Martha and her father as soon as I can, along with our lead councillor on Education, Michael Breslin to seek her continued engagement, along with lots of other pupils, in helping the council to get this issue right. By so doing Martha Payne and her friends will have had a strong and lasting influence not just on school meals, but on the whole of Argyll & Bute."

    This statement supersedes all other council statements on the matter already issued.
    """

    Wow… watching this thing resolve in Internet Time is a trip…

  11. Joe  •  Jun 15, 2012 @6:51 am

    Glad to see they are beginning to reconsider their position. Sometimes embarrassing censorious asshats actually works. Too bad that Carreon and his wife appear thus far to be immune.

  12. Jay  •  Jun 15, 2012 @7:14 am

    Ken, the whole statement was:

    Argyll and Bute Council wholly refutes the unwarranted attacks on its schools catering service which culminated in national press headlines which have led catering staff to fear for their jobs. The Council has directly avoided any criticism of anyone involved in the ‘never seconds’ blog for obvious reasons despite a strongly held view that the information presented in it misrepresented the options and choices available to pupils however this escalation means we had to act to protect staff from the distress and harm it was causing. In particular, the photographic images uploaded appear to only represent a fraction of the choices available to pupils, so a decision has been made by the council to stop photos being taken in the school canteen.

    There have been discussions between senior council staff and Martha’s father however, despite an acknowledgement that the media coverage has produced these unwarranted attacks, he intimated that he would continue with the blog.

    The council has had no complaints for the last two years about the quality of school meals other than one from the Payne family received on 6 June and there have been no changes to the service on offer since the introduction of the blog.

    Pupils have a daily choice of two meals from a menu which is designed with pupils, parents and teachers. Our summer menu is about to be launched and includes main course choices like meat or vegetarian lasagne served with carrots and garlic bread or chicken pie with puff pastry, mashed potato and mixed vegetables.

    Pupils can choose from at least two meals every day. They pay £2 for two courses and this could be a starter and a main or a main and a desert. Each meal comes with milk or water. Pupils can have as much salad and bread as they want. Salad, vegetables, fruit, yoghurt and cheese options are available every day. These are standing options and are not a result of any changes in response to the blog site.

    As part of the curriculum for excellence, pupils in all our schools are regularly taught about healthy eating and at lunch breaks staff encourage pupils to make good choices from what is on offer. We use a system called ‘Nutmeg’ to make sure everything is nutritionally balanced. Our staff also get nutrition awareness training so they know how to provide a good healthy meal. There is portion sized guidance which we adhere to and it is matched to the age of the child so they get the right amount of food. Second portions would mean too many calories for pupils.

    In Lochgilphead Primary School we are piloting a new pre-ordering scheme which is designed to encourage class discussion around meal choices and also improves the accuracy of meal choices. The pupils use a touch screen to select their lunch option and the data is downloaded in the kitchen so they know how many portions of each meal are required. As they place their order, the pupils are given a coloured band which relates to their meal choice that day. They wear it during the morning, and at lunchtime they hand it to the catering assistant, who will give them the corresponding meal.

    The council’s focus is now on supporting the school in the education of young people in Argyll and Bute.”

  13. Ken  •  Jun 15, 2012 @7:19 am

    Thanks, Jay! Clark probably got distracted by an old Guns & Ammo issue and stopped reading halfway through.

  14. Jay  •  Jun 15, 2012 @7:47 am

    You're welcome, Ken. Hope it helps. Sorry, I failed to screen cap it — I usually do… But hey, really, we should all be thanking you for getting involved in British affairs — your post brought a lot of attention to this girl's plight. I've commented here before saying that I really wish we had solicitors, lawyers and barristers like you here in the UK. If you know of any, please let me know, because we desperately need people like you here. (OK, that's enough oral gratification, I suppose.)

  15. Scott Jacobs  •  Jun 15, 2012 @8:41 am

    Clearly there is nothing wrong with this council that deep fat frying wouldn't solve.

    Just a point of correction, since this scene is taking polace in Scotland, the proper measure would be boiling.

  16. CTrees  •  Jun 15, 2012 @9:21 am

    I'm glad they changed their stance, etc.

    What really got me about the girl's blog is that, while the portions are often small, much of the food looks VASTLY better than I got in public school lunches here in America. More expensive, but that could be the changing times (I went from $0.65 in kindergarten to $1.75 in high school)

  17. Grifter  •  Jun 15, 2012 @9:27 am

    How bad was the newspaper article that seems to have caused all this? Was it bad enough that an administrator assumed the info was from the blog (without, of course, reading it, since the correct response is "heavy-handed censoring now, questions and thought never")?

  18. Bob  •  Jun 15, 2012 @10:13 am

    It always surprises me when someone gets something so wrong, and they DON'T double-down. Kudos to the council for righting the ship when they realized they'd hit a reef.

  19. Shadow  •  Jun 15, 2012 @12:53 pm

    Grifter :How bad was the newspaper article that seems to have caused all this?,

    It was in The Daily Record,, which is not generally a good sign.

  20. Jag  •  Jun 15, 2012 @1:58 pm

    It would have been better if the Council Leader said "Those responsible for sacking the people who have just been sacked have been sacked."

  21. SiGraybeard  •  Jun 15, 2012 @7:18 pm

    Linked back from my place.

  22. Gerard  •  Jun 15, 2012 @9:21 pm

    Government, "and the sort of people who aspire to be in it" really didn't sit right with me. I am the plebe-est of the plebe's but I know a few people who've run for minor offices and they don't fit your stereotype.

  23. Aleph  •  Jun 18, 2012 @7:25 am

    So I was about to say that I wish I had been as awesome as this little girl is back when I was nine years old. But upon further reflection, I believe this may be an untrue statement.

    Rather, I should say that I wish I was that awesome /now/, at the age of twenty.

    Still, it's nice to know that the future is bright, if the youth of today has us beat on both wit and maturity.

  24. Sara  •  Jun 19, 2012 @8:06 am

    I can't believe they over reacted to such an extent. Kids have been complaining about cafeteria lunches from time immemorial. It is tradition and often well deserved.
    Had they just ignored it, or at best said what I just did, the entire incident would have gone away.
    I continue to be amazed at people's stupidity.

  25. SeeChao  •  Jun 19, 2012 @1:44 pm

    Well, she's raised over £91,419.00, and another 17k after taxes… Over 10x her goal of 7000, this is a rather amazing story

1 Trackback