Comment Spam From Lawyers: Trying It The Nice Way For Once

Irksome

I think Eric Turkewitz’ exhortation for bloggers to name and shame law firms that engage in comment spam is a worthy crusade. I agree with Eric that lawyers are responsible for the acts of their agents, including crooked SEO firms. I’ve argued before that reckless failure to supervise “marketing professionals” reflects badly on lawyers and should be commented upon. We’ve called out scummy marketers and the lawyers who use them, although I have occasionally later removed their names later if they apologized convincingly. I stand by those efforts.

But for a change of pace, I decided to take a “nice” approach for once. So when we got a flurry of eight comment spams from a Florida firm, I contacted the lawyer, told him (not in so many words) that someone was taking a dump on his reputation online, sent him a sample comment spam, gave him links to some of my posts on this topic, and asked for his comment — all without posting or naming him first. He responded this morning with a cordial and non-threatening email saying he doesn’t know how those spam comments got there, and that he’s not aware of hiring any marketing firm. I sent back some suggestions for Googling the spam comment text to view how widespread it has become, and suggested he look harder into the activities of his web designer and anyone else he might have hired. We’ll see how he responds. Then I’ll evaluate whether the “nice” approach is effective and appropriate, or whether calling people out is the only way to get action and deter this behavior. (I’d be moved, for instance, if the lawyer identifies whoever did this on behalf and throws the person/entity under the bus so we can write about them.)

I’m not taking the nice approach because it’s legally, ethically, or morally required. It’s an experiment, to see if the nice approach has utility in the war on scummy SEO “professionals.”

Be not afraid that I have transformed into a big softie. I just screamed at a paralegal, and I’m putting together some bogus “emergency” projects to hand out to associates at 4:00 today just before the weekend.

Last 5 posts by Ken

1 Comment

1 Comment

  1. Eric T.  •  Jul 30, 2010 @9:25 am

    I’ve used this approach also, and I think it has little downside to it, other than the expenditure of time.

    But if the lawyer does dump his/her marketing company as a result, or forces changes in the way things are done, that’s a good thing.

    Whether that is just pissing in the ocean or not remains to be seen.

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>