Everything I Know About The Police I Learned From Raymond Chandler

Technology

Or was it James Ellroy?  It was definitely James Ellroy.

A Los Angeles County sheriff's detective is the subject of an internal investigation looking into accusations that he had an affair with a woman whose husband he had investigated and helped prosecute for allegedly threatening her.

The department opened an investigation into Det. Phillip Solano in April after the allegations were brought forth by the husband, Alberto Gutierrez. Solano, who had been assigned to the City of Industry station, is on administrative duty for now.

The facts, as alleged by Alberto Gutierrez in a Section 1983 suit filed in the Central District of California, would be that Detective Solano carried on an affair with Gutierrez's wife while investigating and serving as a prosecuting witness for charges of stalking and domestic violence.  According to Gutierrez, Solano cooked up the charges to help the wife obtain a restraining order and full custody of Gutierrez's daughters.

Gutierrez only learned of the affair when his defense attorney's investigator turned up a Facebook friendship between the wife and Solano.

Now this is really "inside baseball" stuff, but for you non-lawyers out there, Facebook is not the typical means by which the police maintain contact with crime victims.  At least not in the United States.

And again, I apologize for the boring monograph on police procedure, but typically the police don't exchange expressions of romantic desire, love, "I miss you," or the like with witnesses.  No, usually the police confine themselves to factual matters, such as asking questions about where the incident took place, the identity of the assailant, the names of other witnesses, whether a weapon was used, and such things.

Evidently this breach of police procedure, which is to say Facebook friendship and other evidence of a romantic relationship between the complaining witness and the investigating officer, was enough to convince the judge presiding over Gutierrez's criminal trial, over a year after charges were filed, to dismiss the case.

We lawyers call this a "technicality."

Anyway, Gutierrez alleges that the relationship was common knowledge in Solano's division of the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, and that Solano's superiors allowed him to stay on the case, prosecuting his lover's ex-husband, while conducting the affair.  That the Sheriff's office turned a blind eye while Detective Solano used his office and power to send his lover's ex-husband to prison.

The Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, of course, calls Gutierrez's charges against Solano "ridiculous" and "unfounded," even as it concedes its Internal Affairs unit is investigating Solano, and that the Detective has been transferred from the field to administrative duty.  Which is to say, the Sheriff doesn't know the facts either, but still denies everything.

We lawyers call this "standard procedure."  Laypeople, as opposed to lawyers, might call it "bullshit."

Via Radley Balko

Last 5 posts by Patrick

6 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Professor Coldheart  •  Jun 18, 2010 @10:25 am

    This should definitely be a steamy Brian dePalma movie, or at the very least a seedy Lifetime Television movie.

  2. Dwight Brown  •  Jun 18, 2010 @11:14 am

    I'm wondering how common this, like police misconduct, is these days.

    I recently finished a true crime book in which one of the co-authors, a former police detective, was in the process of retiring from the force during the events detailed in the book. Why was he retiring? He felt like he was being forced out of the department after:

    * having an extramarital affair with the wife of a suspect he had arrested.
    * being investigated and cleared by the department's internal affairs division, even though he admitted the affair.
    * having charges of "conduct unbecoming an officer" dropped.

    And the thing that surprised me was that this officer felt indignant about his treatment by the department. "How dare they do this to me after nearly 20 years on the job? Just because my conduct could have screwed up the case against this guy, that's no reason I should be treated like a criminal or something!"

    Remember, this guy was one of the heroes of this book. (I'm not naming the book here because, frankly, it was not that great a book, and I don't want to give it any free publicity.)

  3. Patrick  •  Jun 18, 2010 @11:28 am

    Write a bad review of it at your site Dwight. We'll link to it. We're not huge, but we have a decent page rank.

    Contra what I wrote in the post above, the main reason for the spate of police-bashing going on of late is because this site has recently become infested with commenters who believe that proper behavior after being bent over by a cop is to ask, "Please officer, may I have another?"

    I'm not speaking of regulars like JDog, who legitimately disagrees with me on the story about Ian Walsh, the cop in Seattle who gets his jollies from beating women. This influx started with our post on Anthony Graber, the motorcyclist who was charged with a felony for recording a cop pulling a gun on him during a traffic stop.

    I don't know who these people are, but I do know where they're coming from. And I don't like them. I'm going to post unflattering entries on cops, district attorneys, and other authority figures who earn their living by threatening citizens with deadly force or imprisoning citizens, until these people go away. It's not as though I have to work hard to find these stories. Corrupt, stupid, lazy, or just plain evil policemen drop them in my lap.

    This was never an authoritarian blog, but it's going to move a little closer to anarchism for a while.

    We will not serve The Computer.

  4. mike  •  Jun 18, 2010 @7:19 pm

    It's common. Had a brother who was arrested by a cop who was nailing his tramp old lady on the side during his probationary period with the PD. Complaints to his C.O. about this and other derelictions by him and his cop cohorts didn't even rate an answer.

2 Trackbacks