"The Nearest One Could Come To Doing So Would Be To Swallow The Whole Passage Up In The Single Word: Crimethink."

Politics & Current Events

Contra what I last wrote on these pages, it appears that George Orwell's ghost is restless.  These days, he haunts Menifee California:

A parent complaint that a dictionary in her son’s classroom at Oak Meadows Elementary contained the term and definition for “oral sex” prompted school officials in the Menifee Union School District to pull all copies of the book from its fourth and fifth grade classrooms last week.

Lest defenders of morality question the inclusion of some scurrilous sex book in the fourth grade curriculum, it should be noted that the dictionary in question is Noah Webster's.

[W]hen the parent — who was volunteering in her son’s classroom when she came across the word — complained to the school’s principal about the explicit language, curriculum officials with the district made a decision to temporarily remove the books.

Next, according to school board’s policy, a committee consisting of site and district representatives will be formed to “determine the extent to which the challenged material supports the curriculum, the educational appropriateness of the material, and its suitability for the age level of the student.”

This is what we've come to.  One idiot can have the dictionary removed from schools, by complaining that it includes a dirty word.

On second thought, the ghost to invoke isn't Orwell's.  It's that of his countryman C. S. Lewis:

The bright pupil thus remains democratically fettered to his own age group throughout his school career, and a boy who would be capable of tackling Aeschylus or Dante sits listening to his coeval’s attempts to spell out A CAT SAT ON A MAT.

The parent who filed this complaint should be named and ridiculed across the entire internet.  Since I can't do that, I'll have to link to the profile of Menifee Union School District Superintendent Linda Callaway.

Doctor Callaway, you've banned the dictionary.  Is this what you went through the trouble of getting a doctorate in education to do?

H/t: Chris Berez.

Last 5 posts by Patrick

16 Comments

15 Comments

  1. Chris Berez  •  Jan 25, 2010 @2:39 pm

    I'm still having trouble wrapping my mind around this whole thing. I mean, it's a dictionary. Banning books from schools at all is bad enough. But a dictionary? Oh, it has a dirty word. Well of course it has a dirty word, it's a freaking dictionary!

    I liked the point raised by someone quoted in the article: what are they going to do next, ban the encyclopedia because it describes/depicts human anatomy.

  2. PLW  •  Jan 25, 2010 @2:40 pm

    I'm sure she just "happened upon" the entry for oral sex. Someone has a prurient interest, and it ain't Noah Webster.

  3. Ken  •  Jan 25, 2010 @2:47 pm

    You beat me to it.

    Apparently the defenders of this action are arguing that this is a college-level dictionary, containing frank definitions of dirty words, and thus inappropriate for a fourth-grade classroom. Because fourth graders won't encounter dirty words otherwise, and the last thing we want is for them to be able to look them up and find out what they actually mean. Plus, God intended for oral sex to mean "talking about how sex is wrong" except in a sanctioned relationship such as the one between a family-values pastor and his meth-distributing rent boy.

    I'd far rather have my kids have easy access to adult dictionaries and reference works — and thus find out the truth — than have their education dictated by the petty insecurities of the chromosomal dump-site that is the mind of a censor.

    Also, this is a good effort by California. They came to play. But they'll never touch Texas, where Board of Education member Pat Hardy, R-Weatherford, wanted to ban "Brown Bear Brown Bear What Do You See" because it was written by someone with the same name as someone else who once wrote something approving about communism.

    These people breed. And their children vote, and probably don't wash their hands before handling your super-sized fries.

  4. mojo  •  Jan 25, 2010 @3:00 pm

    What dirty word? Fellatio? Cunnilingus?

    Get a grip. Next up: Coitus

  5. Grandy  •  Jan 25, 2010 @7:05 pm

    I dropped my first F-bomb in 2nd grade. And was a better man for it.

  6. proofreader  •  Jan 25, 2010 @9:03 pm

    The superintendent might need to dictionary to learn the difference between "it's" and "its" on her web page.

  7. proofreader  •  Jan 25, 2010 @9:03 pm

    Sorry. Should read "the dictionary" in previous comment.

  8. Rich Rostrom  •  Jan 26, 2010 @2:31 am

    It isn't Noah Webster's dictionary, it's a modern dictionary that a publisher put Webster's name on. Citing the use of a famous old name as evidence of quality or tradition is fatuous.

  9. Vedrfolnir  •  Jan 26, 2010 @11:30 am

    Free-Range Kids covered this today, too. How stupid can you get? Me and my friends were cussing up a storm in fourth grade, it was cool.

  10. Grandy  •  Jan 26, 2010 @11:39 am

    Wait, that wasn't Noah Webster's personal dictionary? Patrick, I'm surprised you would deliberately mislead the little people of the net like that. And frankly, disappointed.

    You might instead have noted that this is a widely used dictionary (and widely used for a reason; popularity doesn't apply here the way it would to a best selling novel).

    Oh, wait, that's what you were doing. Never mind.

  11. Andi  •  Jan 26, 2010 @12:05 pm

    Well, if those kids weren't talking about oral sex before, they sure are now.

    The dictionary in question appears to be Merriam Webster's 10th edition.

  12. Ken  •  Jan 26, 2010 @12:54 pm

    I'm wondering if the pronunciation guide warns you about not using your teeth.

  13. Stephen Taylor  •  Jan 26, 2010 @2:10 pm

    I went to the school district website; it is, of course, "Down for Scheduled Maintenance". I recall sitting with the dictionary in 3rd grade looking for all the objectionable words I had heard or knew; my searches led to a lifetime obsession with all words and a love of reading in general. Although I never did find the definition of "pissant"……….

  14. jb  •  Jan 26, 2010 @3:16 pm

    Hey, some people like that.

  15. proofreader  •  Jan 27, 2010 @11:45 am

    According to an update added to this story, the word cited by the volunteer was NOT in the edition she proffered. If so, how did she find it? Does she have another agenda here? Amazingly, the superintendent is still referring the dictionary which is missing the offending word to a school committee for censorship study.

1 Trackback