*I was not compensated by anyone to state such opinions. These opinions are simply opinions and are in no was meant to disparage or otherwise detract from the great reputation that the US Gov't has built behind its 'brand'.

Of course, that could never happen. The Government controls the internet.

(snicker)

Because every time I do find out something about the careers of Senators' spouses and senior administration officials 20-year racquetball partners, it's usually pretty interesting. And appalling.

To placate such fears, Cleland said the FTC will more likely go after an advertiser instead of a blogger for violations

That's a red flag right there.

If they don't plan on going after bloggers, they need to make that clear in the law.

This has happened with all sorts of bad laws: Lawmaker says, "This law is intended to go after the most egregious violators, not the rank-and-file man on the street", yet when Mr. Rank-and-File Man On The Street gets arrested under the new law, the lawmaker says, "Well, he broke the law and we have to send a message." (cf. the grandmother in Indiana arrested last week for buying OTC cold remedies.)

Of course, the FTC would surely never go after a lowly blogger just for stating a cold, hard fact: a vintage Gretsch guitar is a wise investment; if you don't already own one, get yours today!

To placate such fears, Cleland said the FTC will more likely go after an advertiser instead of a blogger for violations

Your Honor, the FTC has been going after advertisers for violations for years. There's no reason not to punish the other party to the transaction as well.

I cannot believe that anyone, anywhere, still buys the argument "I promise, I will only use my powers for good."

I prefer Mexican Coke to the American-made version.