<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook Gets Awesome Revenge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popehat.com/2009/09/11/facebook-gets-awesome-revenge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/09/11/facebook-gets-awesome-revenge/</link>
	<description>A Group Complaint about Law, Liberty, and Leisure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: September 15 roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/09/11/facebook-gets-awesome-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-43619</link>
		<dc:creator>September 15 roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2009 11:52:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=6044#comment-43619</guid>
		<description>[...] Facebook plays a revenge prank on TechCrunch, and there&#8217;s a lesson there for the thin-skinned [Ken at Popehat] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Facebook plays a revenge prank on TechCrunch, and there's a lesson there for the thin-skinned [Ken at Popehat] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mike D</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/09/11/facebook-gets-awesome-revenge/comment-page-1/#comment-43188</link>
		<dc:creator>Mike D</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Sep 2009 17:09:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=6044#comment-43188</guid>
		<description>Wow, that is a seriously great prank! Way to go FB. I went ahead and read about Arrington&#039;s $25M lawsuit while I was there and while I agree that FB shouldn&#039;t be using people&#039;s pictures in targeted advertisements without explicit consent, all of Arrington&#039;s &quot;I&#039;m so great, look at me, I&#039;m a legitimate celebrity&quot; stuff at the start of the article made me really wonder whether the whole thing was a joke. (Note: I&#039;m convinced now that it&#039;s not a joke, but I suspect Arrington is.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow, that is a seriously great prank! Way to go FB. I went ahead and read about Arrington's $25M lawsuit while I was there and while I agree that FB shouldn't be using people's pictures in targeted advertisements without explicit consent, all of Arrington's "I'm so great, look at me, I'm a legitimate celebrity" stuff at the start of the article made me really wonder whether the whole thing was a joke. (Note: I'm convinced now that it's not a joke, but I suspect Arrington is.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/5 queries in 0.006 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 303/304 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.popehat.com @ 2012-02-12 16:37:39 -->
