And 65% Think You Should Be Required To Serve Salmon At The Wedding

Effluvia

Once of the frustrations of being libertarian-minded is that people are so inconsistent about notions of freedom. Almost everyone is in favor of personal liberty and autonomy and limited government interference in our lives in the abstract. But when you get to the specific, people can rationalize all sorts of hideous state intrusion into our lives, so long as it matches their cultural predilections. And I’m not just talking about liberals railing about the war on drugs but welcoming nanny-state regulation, or conservatives railing about regulation while welcoming PATRIOT ACT nonsense.

Example of the day — 50% of Americans surveyed think that women should be legally required to take their husband’s last name when they get married. That’s some scary escape-from-freedom shit there. I have no problem with 70% thinking that women ought to take their husband’s name. They’re nosy assholes, but that’s their right. But the fact that 50% of Americans think that their government ought to regulate family nomenclature makes me shake my head and wonder just how self-evident it is that we are entitled to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness.

Via.

Last 5 posts by Ken

5 Comments

5 Comments

  1. VRaverna  •  Aug 12, 2009 @8:25 pm

    Are there any country in the world that have requires something like that?

  2. Shay  •  Aug 12, 2009 @8:42 pm

    Utah?

  3. Zubon  •  Aug 12, 2009 @9:34 pm

    The article was careful to refer to taking “her spouse’s” surname/last name in that first paragraph. Does this mean that most Americans believe that this should still be the rule for same-sex marriages? And in that case, do they swap last names, or do they have to pick who is officially the “wife”? Dilemmas.

  4. smurfy  •  Aug 13, 2009 @12:54 pm

    One thing I would support is if the state made it ‘easy’ for wives to change their last names. My wife’s main objection was to waiting in multiple lines and filing out multiple forms.

  5. Rick C  •  Aug 13, 2009 @1:59 pm

    ” I have no problem with 70% thinking that women ought to take their husband’s name. They’re nosy assholes, but that’s their right.”

    How d’you figure? This was a survey. I didn’t see a mention of people opining unprovoked that a woman should take her husband’s name.

    The 50% who think it should be required by law are statists, too, as opposed to nosy, ISTM.

    Then again, look at European countries where potential given names must be on an approved list.

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>