Comments on: Saturday Free Speech Roundup

By: M Btok

M Btok — Tue, 28 Jul 2009 03:21:20 +0000

Canadian’s need to be concerned about Global Elitists trying to sneak into Governmental Offices during our elections! They did it in the USA and look at the trouble they are in! The sample names are ficticous to make it easy to understand! Here’s how they do it:

Two Party Paradyne Trick at Election Time
Elitists hone two candidates, train a Left winger, take another and hone her to be a Right winger! With elitist methods these candidates are trained to move at the right time to be elected, wherby they will arrange financial controls of the country for power gain of the Elitists!
The elitist boss is named David,the Left wing candidate is Obooba, Right wing candidate Sarah !
Because the elite are wealthy they Lobby and are able to create PR for these candidates that gives the candidates credibility among the voters and are promoted to become Dominant candidates!
David doesn’t care who wins between candidates as they have been honed for the Elities and David their Puppet Master!
Liberal Obooba gets voted in as President, he performs foremost for the Elitists! In spite of his oath!
Should Sarah, Right Winger get elected as President ,she will perform for the Elitists, despite her oath!
Right or Left = Elitist Win!

By: Eduardo

Eduardo — Tue, 14 Jul 2009 14:37:41 +0000

Why can’t Bob Newland just accept the second option and then still advocate for legalizing pot? How much leeway does the judge have in enforcing this?

By: Andre

Andre — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 20:11:41 +0000

@Nathan – I says yes, he was going more towards advocating legal restrictions than just complaining.

By: nathan daniel moore

nathan daniel moore — Sun, 12 Jul 2009 16:32:27 +0000

Reading a bit more of the Mellencamp article makes him sound more like a typical Old Fogey than a Cencorious Twit. His comments about Freedom of Speech being really about collective (as opposed to personal) expression are obviously not well-informed. But do you really think he was advocating legal restrictions on freedom of speech, rather than just lamenting the proliferation of juvenile “commentary” on sites like YouTube (“UR VIDEO SUX U F*CKTARD!!!1!)?