<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: No Justice For Savana Redding, But At Least They Can&#039;t Do It To Your Kids</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popehat.com/2009/06/25/no-justice-for-savana-redding-but-at-least-they-cant-do-it-to-your-kids/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/06/25/no-justice-for-savana-redding-but-at-least-they-cant-do-it-to-your-kids/</link>
	<description>A Group Complaint about Law, Liberty, and Leisure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blawg Review #218 &#124;</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/06/25/no-justice-for-savana-redding-but-at-least-they-cant-do-it-to-your-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-34102</link>
		<dc:creator>Blawg Review #218 &#124;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 03:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4942#comment-34102</guid>
		<description>[...] Examples of failed leadership are much easier to find.  Did it really require a decision by the Supreme Court to determine that a 13-year-old can&#8217;t be stripped searched?  Her suspected crime?  Having Ibuprofen on her person in violation of a &#8220;zero&#8221; tolerance no drug policy. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Examples of failed leadership are much easier to find.  Did it really require a decision by the Supreme Court to determine that a 13-year-old can't be stripped searched?  Her suspected crime?  Having Ibuprofen on her person in violation of a "zero" tolerance no drug policy. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Weekly Web Watch 06/22/09 – 06/28/09 &#171; EXECUTIVE WATCH</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/06/25/no-justice-for-savana-redding-but-at-least-they-cant-do-it-to-your-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-34086</link>
		<dc:creator>Weekly Web Watch 06/22/09 – 06/28/09 &#171; EXECUTIVE WATCH</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Jun 2009 22:41:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4942#comment-34086</guid>
		<description>[...] the violation.  Ed Whelan has the rundown.  Patrick at Popehat summarizes the decision as “No justice for Savannah Redding, but at least they can’t do it to your kids.”  Publius at Obsidian Wings has a more upbeat take, arguing that qualified immunity is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the violation.  Ed Whelan has the rundown.  Patrick at Popehat summarizes the decision as “No justice for Savannah Redding, but at least they can’t do it to your kids.”  Publius at Obsidian Wings has a more upbeat take, arguing that qualified immunity is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/06/25/no-justice-for-savana-redding-but-at-least-they-cant-do-it-to-your-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-33781</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 19:44:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4942#comment-33781</guid>
		<description>Re: &quot;Of course, for everyone else the maxim that ignorance of the law is no excuse stands, but in this case Redding’s assailants get a pass.&quot;

Well, of course. The principle that ignorance of the law is no excuse only applies to private citizens, whom we very reasonably expect to have a lawyer-level expertise in every aspect of every law on the books. Public servants, on the other hand, cannot possibly be expected to be cognizant of the laws that apply to them in their professional capacity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Re: "Of course, for everyone else the maxim that ignorance of the law is no excuse stands, but in this case Redding’s assailants get a pass."</p>
<p>Well, of course. The principle that ignorance of the law is no excuse only applies to private citizens, whom we very reasonably expect to have a lawyer-level expertise in every aspect of every law on the books. Public servants, on the other hand, cannot possibly be expected to be cognizant of the laws that apply to them in their professional capacity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Schwartz</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/06/25/no-justice-for-savana-redding-but-at-least-they-cant-do-it-to-your-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-33714</link>
		<dc:creator>David Schwartz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 08:11:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4942#comment-33714</guid>
		<description>Your honors, this search falls under the drugs exception to the fourth amendment. It&#039;s an emanation from a penumbra.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your honors, this search falls under the drugs exception to the fourth amendment. It's an emanation from a penumbra.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/06/25/no-justice-for-savana-redding-but-at-least-they-cant-do-it-to-your-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-33617</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 17:15:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4942#comment-33617</guid>
		<description>The thing I find most striking about the 9th Circuit decision is the tone of the dissent. As opposed to Thomas, who doesn&#039;t seem like he&#039;d mind if random strip searches were used in conjunction with metal detectors as kids entered the building, the &lt;i&gt;en banc&lt;/i&gt; dissent at least seems sympathetic to the Savana Reddings of the world, even if they have an exaggerated sense of fear at the dangers of ibuprofen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing I find most striking about the 9th Circuit decision is the tone of the dissent. As opposed to Thomas, who doesn't seem like he'd mind if random strip searches were used in conjunction with metal detectors as kids entered the building, the <i>en banc</i> dissent at least seems sympathetic to the Savana Reddings of the world, even if they have an exaggerated sense of fear at the dangers of ibuprofen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/06/25/no-justice-for-savana-redding-but-at-least-they-cant-do-it-to-your-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-33611</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:26:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4942#comment-33611</guid>
		<description>Go back and read the Ninth&#039;s en banc decision, if you want a compelling factual narrative.  It&#039;s linked at the earlier post.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go back and read the Ninth's en banc decision, if you want a compelling factual narrative.  It's linked at the earlier post.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Charles</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/06/25/no-justice-for-savana-redding-but-at-least-they-cant-do-it-to-your-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-33609</link>
		<dc:creator>Charles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 16:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4942#comment-33609</guid>
		<description>Redding isn&#039;t wholly without remedy yet; the case was remanded for an examination of the liability of the school district. The factual recitation is pretty interesting, actually, and made me a lot more sympathetic to the Vice-Principal&#039;s decision than I expected to be. Not as sympathetic as Justice Thomas, mind you, but more than Justices Ginsburg and Stevens.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Redding isn't wholly without remedy yet; the case was remanded for an examination of the liability of the school district. The factual recitation is pretty interesting, actually, and made me a lot more sympathetic to the Vice-Principal's decision than I expected to be. Not as sympathetic as Justice Thomas, mind you, but more than Justices Ginsburg and Stevens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/06/25/no-justice-for-savana-redding-but-at-least-they-cant-do-it-to-your-kids/comment-page-1/#comment-33601</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 15:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4942#comment-33601</guid>
		<description>In a more just world, Kerry Wilson, Helen Romero, and Peggy Schwallier would be registered sex offenders now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a more just world, Kerry Wilson, Helen Romero, and Peggy Schwallier would be registered sex offenders now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.062 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 393/394 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.popehat.com @ 2012-02-13 02:37:51 -->
