This Blessed Plot, This Earth, This Realm, This Haven For the Censorious and the Thin-Skinned, This England

Law

Usually bad things are not as bad as they are portrayed on blogs. Blogs tend to exaggerate, because otherwise no one would read them. Plus, if blogs didn’t exaggerate, dead tree journalists would have nothing to feel superior about as they made soup out of catsup and hot water.

However, despite occasional signs of improvement, English libel law is every bit as bad (censorious, unjust, and chilling) as blogs (including ours) have been suggesting. Don’t believe me? Check out this infuriating article by First Amendment scholar Floyd Abrams over at Index on Censorship. Abrams reports that plaintiffs win 90% of libel suits in English courts, an astounding figure. Read it.

Last 5 posts by Ken

2 Comments

1 Comment

  1. Bruce  •  Jun 15, 2009 @6:32 pm

    There are some awful, high profile cases of libel.

    Jeffrey Archer won a libel case on 1987 against the allegations he had sex with a prostitute winning 500k pounds.

    In 2001 he went to gaol for perjury and perverting the course of justice in that case, spending 4 years in pokey and repaying 1.3M pounds to the Daily Star.

    All of which would have been avoided if Britain were a bit less Victorian in their views on free speech. Yet another hangover of the class wars that inexplicably continue in that country.

1 Trackback

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>