<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: This Lawsuit Isn&#039;t About Money. It&#039;s About Protecting The Rights Of Insane Douchenozzles All Over America.</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popehat.com/2009/05/20/this-lawsuit-isnt-about-money-its-about-protecting-the-rights-of-insane-douchenozzles-all-over-america/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/05/20/this-lawsuit-isnt-about-money-its-about-protecting-the-rights-of-insane-douchenozzles-all-over-america/</link>
	<description>A Group Complaint about Law, Liberty, and Leisure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyberlaw Central &#187; Blawg Review #213</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/05/20/this-lawsuit-isnt-about-money-its-about-protecting-the-rights-of-insane-douchenozzles-all-over-america/comment-page-1/#comment-30874</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyberlaw Central &#187; Blawg Review #213</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 08:42:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4246#comment-30874</guid>
		<description>[...] - Patrick discussed the misguided defamation claim filed by a conservative Twitterer and &#8220;Tea Pa.... I don&#8217;t know of any Douglas Adams connection here, other than to suggest that a man who [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] &#8211; Patrick discussed the misguided defamation claim filed by a conservative Twitterer and "Tea Pa&#8230;. I don't know of any Douglas Adams connection here, other than to suggest that a man who [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: May 22 roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/05/20/this-lawsuit-isnt-about-money-its-about-protecting-the-rights-of-insane-douchenozzles-all-over-america/comment-page-1/#comment-30558</link>
		<dc:creator>May 22 roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4246#comment-30558</guid>
		<description>[...] &#8220;Top Conservatives on Twitter&#8221; organizer takes critic to court [Citizen Media Law, Patrick @ Popehat] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] "Top Conservatives on Twitter" organizer takes critic to court [Citizen Media Law, Patrick @ Popehat] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/05/20/this-lawsuit-isnt-about-money-its-about-protecting-the-rights-of-insane-douchenozzles-all-over-america/comment-page-1/#comment-30536</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 23:08:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4246#comment-30536</guid>
		<description>Sober analysis by the &lt;a href=&quot;http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/top-conservative-twitter-takes-critic-court&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Citizens Media Blog Project.&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sober analysis by the <a href="http://www.citmedialaw.org/blog/2009/top-conservative-twitter-takes-critic-court" rel="nofollow">Citizens Media Blog Project.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/05/20/this-lawsuit-isnt-about-money-its-about-protecting-the-rights-of-insane-douchenozzles-all-over-america/comment-page-1/#comment-30438</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:52:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4246#comment-30438</guid>
		<description>That really was too much information...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That really was too much information&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/05/20/this-lawsuit-isnt-about-money-its-about-protecting-the-rights-of-insane-douchenozzles-all-over-america/comment-page-1/#comment-30421</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:29:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4246#comment-30421</guid>
		<description>Wow.  I just read the complaint.  It&#039;s like Walt Disney World for the lawyer responding to it.  I got wood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow.  I just read the complaint.  It's like Walt Disney World for the lawyer responding to it.  I got wood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/05/20/this-lawsuit-isnt-about-money-its-about-protecting-the-rights-of-insane-douchenozzles-all-over-america/comment-page-1/#comment-30419</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:28:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4246#comment-30419</guid>
		<description>Have jurisdictions outside of Minnesota even considered the legal status of lizard people?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Have jurisdictions outside of Minnesota even considered the legal status of lizard people?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/05/20/this-lawsuit-isnt-about-money-its-about-protecting-the-rights-of-insane-douchenozzles-all-over-america/comment-page-1/#comment-30413</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 19:02:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4246#comment-30413</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve drafted -- and won -- anti-SLAPP motions recently, and collected nice amounts of attorney fees for clients.  What&#039;s another one?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've drafted &#8212; and won &#8212; anti-SLAPP motions recently, and collected nice amounts of attorney fees for clients.  What's another one?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Jacobs</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/05/20/this-lawsuit-isnt-about-money-its-about-protecting-the-rights-of-insane-douchenozzles-all-over-america/comment-page-1/#comment-30412</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Jacobs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:20:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4246#comment-30412</guid>
		<description>&lt;blockquote&gt;but continues to maintain her libelous post knowingly and maliciously including the charge of tax fraud which she knows to be false&lt;/blockquote&gt;Maybe I&#039;m just strange, but I generally think that ANYONE who has managed to amass tens of thousands of dollars in unpaid tax liens, they were attempting to defraud the IRS by, at best simply not paying their taxes, and at worse lying outright on their returns and cheating the system in some other way.

I would add to Grasmick&#039;s statements, and call Mr Leahy a &quot;massive tool&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<blockquote><p>but continues to maintain her libelous post knowingly and maliciously including the charge of tax fraud which she knows to be false</p></blockquote>
<p>Maybe I'm just strange, but I generally think that ANYONE who has managed to amass tens of thousands of dollars in unpaid tax liens, they were attempting to defraud the IRS by, at best simply not paying their taxes, and at worse lying outright on their returns and cheating the system in some other way.</p>
<p>I would add to Grasmick's statements, and call Mr Leahy a "massive tool".</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/05/20/this-lawsuit-isnt-about-money-its-about-protecting-the-rights-of-insane-douchenozzles-all-over-america/comment-page-1/#comment-30409</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 18:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=4246#comment-30409</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve read it now, and it&#039;s an astonishingly bad complaint, even by the standards of pro se litigants.

Leahy complains himself straight into dismissal, by boasting that he&#039;s a public figure and admitting the genuineness of the tax liens, in this astonishing paragraph:

&lt;blockquote&gt;Grasmick is aware of Leahy’s discussions with the United States Internal Revenue Service to establish an installment agreement to satisfy the outstanding federal tax liens against him, but continues to maintain her libelous post knowingly and maliciously including the charge of tax fraud which she knows to be false. This is intentionally designed to interfere with Leahy’s rights as a citizen to execute an installment agreement with the United States Internal Revenue Service without that process being interfered with by individuals who are not party to the discussion.&lt;/blockquote&gt;

Go directly to Rule 12(b)(6) or the Tennessee equivalent.  Do not pass go.  Do receive a judgment for the defendant&#039;s attorney&#039;s fees.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I've read it now, and it's an astonishingly bad complaint, even by the standards of pro se litigants.</p>
<p>Leahy complains himself straight into dismissal, by boasting that he's a public figure and admitting the genuineness of the tax liens, in this astonishing paragraph:</p>
<blockquote><p>Grasmick is aware of Leahy’s discussions with the United States Internal Revenue Service to establish an installment agreement to satisfy the outstanding federal tax liens against him, but continues to maintain her libelous post knowingly and maliciously including the charge of tax fraud which she knows to be false. This is intentionally designed to interfere with Leahy’s rights as a citizen to execute an installment agreement with the United States Internal Revenue Service without that process being interfered with by individuals who are not party to the discussion.</p></blockquote>
<p>Go directly to Rule 12(b)(6) or the Tennessee equivalent.  Do not pass go.  Do receive a judgment for the defendant's attorney's fees.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.042 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 408/409 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.popehat.com @ 2012-02-13 03:45:36 -->
