Contact
Subscribe
Apr 28, 2009 
By 
Speaking of juror distractions, I cannot fathom what judge would not have arranged, no, demanded, that Mr. T sit on his jury. If a lawyer attempted to remove Mr. T, it would be worth the appellate reversal to overrule the lawyer, as a pitiable fool, just to say that you’d tried a case with Mr. T.
Lawyers come and go. Judges come and go. Cases come and go. Even clients come and go. The opportunity to try a case with a jury consisting of Mr. T and 11 random fools, that comes but once a lifetime.
Last 5 posts by Patrick
- Don't Lose That Famous Temper, Bob. - September 2nd, 2010
- How To Raise A Great Sailor - August 30th, 2010
- Habeas Corpus Shouldn't Mean "Tag! You're It!" - August 26th, 2010
- Activist Judges Seek To KILL US ALL! But That's Just The Start. - August 23rd, 2010
- FIFTY THOUSAND CRONKITES?!? - August 21st, 2010
5 Comments 
