Contact
Subscribe
Apr 28, 2009 
By 
Speaking of juror distractions, I cannot fathom what judge would not have arranged, no, demanded, that Mr. T sit on his jury. If a lawyer attempted to remove Mr. T, it would be worth the appellate reversal to overrule the lawyer, as a pitiable fool, just to say that you’d tried a case with Mr. T.
Lawyers come and go. Judges come and go. Cases come and go. Even clients come and go. The opportunity to try a case with a jury consisting of Mr. T and 11 random fools, that comes but once a lifetime.
Last 5 posts by Patrick
- "There Are No Second Acts In American Lives." - February 9th, 2010
- "It Is A Barren Wasteland, Riddled With Fire, Ash, And Dust. The Very Air You Breathe Is A Poisonous Fume." - February 3rd, 2010
- Dear CNN, Reuters, New York Times, Fox, Et. Al. - January 29th, 2010
- State Of The Union - January 27th, 2010
- Read The Whole Thing - January 26th, 2010
5 Comments 
