<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Bureaucratic Inertia Is A Feature, Not a Bug</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/27/bureaucratic-inertia-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/27/bureaucratic-inertia-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/</link>
	<description>A Group Complaint about Law, Liberty, and Leisure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: SMV</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/27/bureaucratic-inertia-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-26994</link>
		<dc:creator>SMV</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 12:43:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=3679#comment-26994</guid>
		<description>http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiOPepfcV4k

File a Notice of Claim, sue them in small claims court for breach of bailment and conversion or replevin if the camera is returned within a week after service of the summons before you buy a new equivalent one, and see how quickly the camera gets returned.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiOPepfcV4k" rel="nofollow">http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JiOPepfcV4k</a></p>
<p>File a Notice of Claim, sue them in small claims court for breach of bailment and conversion or replevin if the camera is returned within a week after service of the summons before you buy a new equivalent one, and see how quickly the camera gets returned.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: April 2 roundup</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/27/bureaucratic-inertia-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-26991</link>
		<dc:creator>April 2 roundup</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Apr 2009 11:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=3679#comment-26991</guid>
		<description>[...] She videotaped cops arresting her son. They took her camera. Could she have it back, please? [Ken @ Popehat] [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] She videotaped cops arresting her son. They took her camera. Could she have it back, please? [Ken @ Popehat] [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/27/bureaucratic-inertia-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-26829</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:24:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=3679#comment-26829</guid>
		<description>Ah.  In many cases, that&#039;s a thumpin&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ah.  In many cases, that's a thumpin'.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Armando</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/27/bureaucratic-inertia-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-26827</link>
		<dc:creator>Armando</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 22:22:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=3679#comment-26827</guid>
		<description>This is good to know. Depending on your line of work, getting your camera confiscated could be disastrous. What if you were a documentary crew person or a filmmaker and the police gets your camera.. and then it takes months to get your camera back? Not cool, I say. But what happens if you refuse to give your camera?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is good to know. Depending on your line of work, getting your camera confiscated could be disastrous. What if you were a documentary crew person or a filmmaker and the police gets your camera.. and then it takes months to get your camera back? Not cool, I say. But what happens if you refuse to give your camera?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joel Rosenberg</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/27/bureaucratic-inertia-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-26824</link>
		<dc:creator>Joel Rosenberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 21:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=3679#comment-26824</guid>
		<description>The seize-the-camera-as evidence game is pretty awful.  If only there were some workaround, like something that is a camera, but looks like a pen . . . 

http://surprisinggift.com/product_info.php?products_id=1226

(No, that doesn&#039;t solve the problem of badged thugs; it does meliorate it, maybe.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The seize-the-camera-as evidence game is pretty awful.  If only there were some workaround, like something that is a camera, but looks like a pen . . . </p>
<p><a href="http://surprisinggift.com/product_info.php?products_id=1226" rel="nofollow">http://surprisinggift.com/product_info.php?products_id=1226</a></p>
<p>(No, that doesn't solve the problem of badged thugs; it does meliorate it, maybe.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Baxter</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/27/bureaucratic-inertia-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-26761</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Baxter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 29 Mar 2009 18:57:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=3679#comment-26761</guid>
		<description>in the world of finance, there is this thing called fiduciary responsibility, which means, to my limited knowledge, that someone entrusted with someone else&#039;s goods can face repercussions for mishandling said goods. Wouldn&#039;t it at least be imaginable to have legislation specifying rights in this regard for confiscated property? I suppose personal responsibility is out of the question, but organizations can respond to financial incentives.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in the world of finance, there is this thing called fiduciary responsibility, which means, to my limited knowledge, that someone entrusted with someone else's goods can face repercussions for mishandling said goods. Wouldn't it at least be imaginable to have legislation specifying rights in this regard for confiscated property? I suppose personal responsibility is out of the question, but organizations can respond to financial incentives.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/27/bureaucratic-inertia-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-26681</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 17:00:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=3679#comment-26681</guid>
		<description>This is a very interesting inversion of a common point about the constitutional system of checks and balances. In some contexts, we favor governmental inertia. For instance, we&#039;d rather Congress take its time and deliberate than move constantly from one perceived crisis to the next. (How far we have shifted from that ideal!)

Most bureaucrats seem to view rules as a mechanism for avoiding work.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is a very interesting inversion of a common point about the constitutional system of checks and balances. In some contexts, we favor governmental inertia. For instance, we'd rather Congress take its time and deliberate than move constantly from one perceived crisis to the next. (How far we have shifted from that ideal!)</p>
<p>Most bureaucrats seem to view rules as a mechanism for avoiding work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dbt1949</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/27/bureaucratic-inertia-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-26645</link>
		<dc:creator>dbt1949</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Mar 2009 03:00:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=3679#comment-26645</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s why guns are preferable to carry than cameras. That way when you shoot someone doing a crime.........


Alright! Lighten up people. It was just a joke! 


Mostly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That's why guns are preferable to carry than cameras. That way when you shoot someone doing a crime&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;</p>
<p>Alright! Lighten up people. It was just a joke! </p>
<p>Mostly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ezra</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/27/bureaucratic-inertia-is-a-feature-not-a-bug/comment-page-1/#comment-26616</link>
		<dc:creator>Ezra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Mar 2009 17:14:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=3679#comment-26616</guid>
		<description>Hmm. This story sure doesn&#039;t do anything to lessen my cynicism expressed below about police...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hmm. This story sure doesn't do anything to lessen my cynicism expressed below about police&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/12 queries in 0.024 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 408/409 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.popehat.com @ 2012-02-12 22:34:16 -->
