Still Far from NORML

Irksome, Politics & Current Events

There's probably about 1.1 million people in federal, state, and local custody right now based on drug charges. That's more people than live in Rhode Island — or in seven of our other states. The federal government spends about $20 billion a year on the War on Drugs, and the states spend about another $30 billion. (That's not counting the cost of incarcerating all those people, by the way — that costs a rough average of $70 per prisoner per day — try to multiply that by 1.1 million prisoners and 365 days and watch your calculator flash ERROR.) Granted, $50 billion doesn't sound like as much money as it did before the last six months, but it's still a fair piece of cash.

Despite all of this, the notion that we may want to reconsider the War on Drugs is, apparently, an occasion for giggles in the highest circles of power.

When President Obama encountered numerous questions about the potential legalization of marijuana in his online outreach today, he — and the people surrounding him, and the media reporting on it — responded like they were watching a Cheech and Chong movie:

Given the opportunity to say what’s really on their minds without going through the filter of the mainstream media, people “buzzed up” a series of questions that seemed to suggest broad interest in legalizing marijuana and taxing it.

That's Politico writer John Ward Anderson going for the rather lame pot joke. To his credit, he goes for the rest of the article without mentioning Doritos or bongwater.

After taking questions lower on the list, Obama addressed the pot issue head on, noting the huge number of questions about marijuana legalization and remarking with a chuckle, “I don't know what that says about the online audience."

"Hyuck hyuck! This new technology that got me elected is FILLED WITH HIPPIES! Hyuck!"

The answer is no, I don't think that is a good strategy to grow our economy," he said, as the audience in the room applauded and joined him in a laugh.

There are perfectly good reasons to be skeptical about whether legalizing marijuana and taxing it would have a substantial revenue impact. But there's no excuse for treating the subject of drug legalization as a joke. Obama can at least be credited with not reacting with mock OMG NO THINK OF THE CHIIILDRUUUN outrage, which is the standard response among mainstream politicians. But so long as he treats the issue as a joke, he's part of the problem. Drug legalization will remain a fringe issue until politicians have the courage to address it directly and seriously. Until then, we will continue to spend untold billions on an utterly hopeless war and incarcerate a sizable portion of the populace without significant reflection on whether it makes sense to be doing it. It's entirely possible that society will decide that the right answer is to continue criminalization. But right now, that's the decision by default, an unreflective reaction. The issue deserves more than that. It deserves more than jokes.

Last 5 posts by Ken

4 Comments

4 Comments

  1. Jerry  •  Mar 26, 2009 @3:14 pm

    That's one of the sanest paragraphs about drugs I've ever read. Hysteria gets us nowhere. Rational discourse rules!

  2. Patrick  •  Mar 26, 2009 @6:23 pm

    Our past three Presidents have all admitted using pot. I'll bet that two of them used cocaine.

    It isn't our politicians' failure that we have these laws. Politicians are cowards. They follow the path of least resistance. The path of least resistance compels them to avoid saying what most people know.

    Until enough voters demand it, until it becomes a top ten issue for many people, the drug war won't end.

  3. Al  •  Mar 27, 2009 @7:22 am

    While he's not talking specifically about the war on drugs, this guy does a good job of explaining why it won't going away any time soon.

  4. Eduardo  •  Apr 2, 2009 @12:41 pm

    Obama definitely did cocaine. He admitted to it in one of his biographies. And the weed. Which makes this even more hypocritical.

    It's interesting to see an African-American, and especially one who has admitted to being a criminal (as much as this should be a crime) shrug off this suggestion. Communities around the country are torn apart by these drug incarcerations, which he knows intimately due to his time as a community organizer.

    But, like Patrick says, politicians are cowards.

    A lot of people who hear my talk about drugs assume I'm a big ol' pothead, but I hate drugs in all their forms (non-medical, I mean). I did the pot in high-school, and don't really regret it, but think it was a stupid idea. Especially seeing where the drugs come from and who makes money off of the trade. But keeping them illegal is aiding, and I hate to quote GWB here, groups that use terrorism. A cursory glance at Juarez or Tijuana will prove that.

    But that brings up another point. A lot of jobs are dependent on "fighting the war on drugs." And those jobs are law enforcement, and no politician (again, cowards) wants to cut law enforcement jobs and look "weak on crime."

    I will start a political party called "We Love Crime." We'll be very soft on crime.