Comments on: Safe, Legal, And Hairless

By: Saroj

Saroj — Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:12:33 +0000

I don't think the issue is so much the actual waxing as it is proper hygiene on the part of the workers who are actually doing the bikini/Brazilian waxes to ensure that the wax and other equipment being used are both sterile. So why not just regulate that, instead of banning the practice outright?

By: March 22 roundup

March 22 roundup — Sun, 22 Mar 2009 16:47:28 +0000

[...] ban on Brazilian waxing [Asbury Park Press, JammieWearingFool, Jaira Lima and protest site, Popehat, News12 video] Florida, however, won't let you get a fish-nibble pedicure [...]

By: Bruce

Bruce — Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:59:19 +0000

The United States must truly be a utopia if these are the only problems left to solve for your various legislators.

I guess 'busybody' is one of the pre-requisites for entering politics.

By: shg

shg — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:42:47 +0000

I've just rented a complete stripmall just on the NY side of the GWB and have renamed it "Little Brazil." Our motto is around the world for $9.99. Special price for anyone who mentions Popehat.

By: Patrick

Patrick — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 18:20:38 +0000

And of course, the criminal connection surfaces.

By: The Agitator » Blog Archive » When Hairless Genitalia Is Banned, Only Criminals Will Have Hairless Genitalia

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:54:58 +0000

[...] the superbly-named blog, Popehat. Digg it | reddit | del.icio.us | [...]

By: Ezra

Ezra — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:36:44 +0000

I saw this story, and hoped one of the legal eagles would pick it up. It made me smile. And yeah, Ken found the money quote. Just beautiful!

If you outlaw Brazilians, only outlaws will have Brazilians!

By: Ken

Ken — Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:49:00 +0000

“The genital area is not part of the abdomen or legs as some might assume,” Lamm said.

THAT'S what I've been doing wrong.