Comments on: Internet Bluster Is Foolhardy http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/03/internet-bluster-is-foolhardy/ A Group Complaint about Law, Liberty, and Leisure Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:39:39 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: rsbennett3 http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/03/internet-bluster-is-foolhardy/comment-page-1/#comment-49525 rsbennett3 Sat, 24 Oct 2009 04:01:15 +0000 http://www.popehat.com/?p=3347#comment-49525 I would be very concerned if my attorney did not know the difference between "no" and "know." I would be very concerned if my attorney did not know the difference between "no" and "know."

]]> By: Patrick http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/03/internet-bluster-is-foolhardy/comment-page-1/#comment-24930 Patrick Thu, 05 Mar 2009 20:28:09 +0000 http://www.popehat.com/?p=3347#comment-24930 Update: Ms. Kelly has written a sincere and full apology, which <a href="http://patterico.com/2009/03/04/kathy-kelly-retracts/" rel="nofollow">Patterico has accepted. </a> Good for her. Update: Ms. Kelly has written a sincere and full apology, which Patterico has accepted.

Good for her.

]]> By: March 5 roundup http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/03/internet-bluster-is-foolhardy/comment-page-1/#comment-24901 March 5 roundup Thu, 05 Mar 2009 14:35:57 +0000 http://www.popehat.com/?p=3347#comment-24901 [...] to blogger Patterico: how dare you talk to my witnesses as part of your research on my case? [Ken @ Popehat, Sheffner/Copyrights and Campaigns, Volokh, Hricik/Legal Ethics Forum; lawyer Kathy Kelly retracts [...] [...] to blogger Patterico: how dare you talk to my witnesses as part of your research on my case? [Ken @ Popehat, Sheffner/Copyrights and Campaigns, Volokh, Hricik/Legal Ethics Forum; lawyer Kathy Kelly retracts [...]

]]> By: Patrick http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/03/internet-bluster-is-foolhardy/comment-page-1/#comment-24825 Patrick Wed, 04 Mar 2009 12:16:51 +0000 http://www.popehat.com/?p=3347#comment-24825 If discussion on large weblogs today plays in some part the role that media attention used to play in heightening public attention toward injustice in individual cases, Ms. Kelly has spoiled the gift her client received from Balko/Reason. Where only Patterico, who himself has a large site, was discussing flaws in the Balko narrative, now Instapundit and Volokh, huge blogs, are directing attention to Ms. Kelly's foolish conduct, and collaterally directing attention to Patterico's questions about the Duncan case. Stupid. If discussion on large weblogs today plays in some part the role that media attention used to play in heightening public attention toward injustice in individual cases, Ms. Kelly has spoiled the gift her client received from Balko/Reason.

Where only Patterico, who himself has a large site, was discussing flaws in the Balko narrative, now Instapundit and Volokh, huge blogs, are directing attention to Ms. Kelly's foolish conduct, and collaterally directing attention to Patterico's questions about the Duncan case. Stupid.

]]> By: Shkspr http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/03/internet-bluster-is-foolhardy/comment-page-1/#comment-24808 Shkspr Wed, 04 Mar 2009 05:21:29 +0000 http://www.popehat.com/?p=3347#comment-24808 Her argument would have more weight if in addition to being an attorney she were also a Computer Engineer. Her argument would have more weight if in addition to being an attorney she were also a Computer Engineer.

]]> By: Patterico http://www.popehat.com/2009/03/03/internet-bluster-is-foolhardy/comment-page-1/#comment-24802 Patterico Wed, 04 Mar 2009 02:25:57 +0000 http://www.popehat.com/?p=3347#comment-24802 I'll note only that there is very little doubt that Ms. Kelly is the one behind the bogus threat. Either that, or someone is framing her. I e-mailed her at her e-mail address, which clearly relates to her organization. She gave me a phone number to call, but I deferred as I want our communications to be documented in writing. I don't think I'm speaking out of turn to say that I told Prof. Volokh the above, and he was satisfied it was her. And he didn't even know that her IP address traces back to New Orleans (though I did). I have sent her this link as well as that for Prof. Volokh's post. I'll note only that there is very little doubt that Ms. Kelly is the one behind the bogus threat. Either that, or someone is framing her.

I e-mailed her at her e-mail address, which clearly relates to her organization. She gave me a phone number to call, but I deferred as I want our communications to be documented in writing.

I don't think I'm speaking out of turn to say that I told Prof. Volokh the above, and he was satisfied it was her. And he didn't even know that her IP address traces back to New Orleans (though I did).

I have sent her this link as well as that for Prof. Volokh's post.

]]>