<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Luke 15:21</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popehat.com/2008/07/10/luke-1521/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/07/10/luke-1521/</link>
	<description>A Group Complaint about Law, Liberty, and Leisure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 22:39:39 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/07/10/luke-1521/comment-page-1/#comment-5519</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:34:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=1497#comment-5519</guid>
		<description>&lt;a href=&quot;http://www.extrememortman.com/funniest-2008/making-a-mountain-out-of-a-mohel/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;&quot;I want to cut his nuts off.&quot;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.extrememortman.com/funniest-2008/making-a-mountain-out-of-a-mohel/" rel="nofollow">"I want to cut his nuts off."</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave B</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/07/10/luke-1521/comment-page-1/#comment-5518</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave B</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 20:21:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=1497#comment-5518</guid>
		<description>Well, as an *intelligent* and well rounded individual, I have to say, with loathing, that I see points on BOTH sides of &#039;the fence&#039; in these situations...

To use a basic scientific principle, something is either true or false, clear or obscured.  When you hear basic truth you must acknowledge it without regard for the source. When you hear so-called &#039;half truths&#039;, you should NOT look for the nugget of truth within it but reject the statement in its entirety and castigate the purveyor, who is serving only their OWN personal agenda by trying to confuse you (can you say &#039;Chewbacca defense?&#039;)

All that was big words for this :Black or white, rich or poor, what the man (Obama) said was true, you KNOW its true, and all your arguments against it are nothing but peeing in the wind to try and sooth your wounded egos.

I give NO credence to the rantings of fools like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Pat Robertson, or even Rush Limbaugh and their ilk.  They have ulterior motives. They do *NOT* want the best for all of us, they want the best for their private agenda.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, as an *intelligent* and well rounded individual, I have to say, with loathing, that I see points on BOTH sides of 'the fence' in these situations&#8230;</p>
<p>To use a basic scientific principle, something is either true or false, clear or obscured.  When you hear basic truth you must acknowledge it without regard for the source. When you hear so-called 'half truths', you should NOT look for the nugget of truth within it but reject the statement in its entirety and castigate the purveyor, who is serving only their OWN personal agenda by trying to confuse you (can you say 'Chewbacca defense?')</p>
<p>All that was big words for this :Black or white, rich or poor, what the man (Obama) said was true, you KNOW its true, and all your arguments against it are nothing but peeing in the wind to try and sooth your wounded egos.</p>
<p>I give NO credence to the rantings of fools like Al Sharpton, Jesse Jackson, Pat Robertson, or even Rush Limbaugh and their ilk.  They have ulterior motives. They do *NOT* want the best for all of us, they want the best for their private agenda.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grandy</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/07/10/luke-1521/comment-page-1/#comment-5504</link>
		<dc:creator>Grandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=1497#comment-5504</guid>
		<description>Didn&#039;t think about that for Chomsky, so there&#039;s the equivalent to 99.9% of Moore fat jokes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Didn't think about that for Chomsky, so there's the equivalent to 99.9% of Moore fat jokes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grandy</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/07/10/luke-1521/comment-page-1/#comment-5503</link>
		<dc:creator>Grandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:28:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=1497#comment-5503</guid>
		<description>Chomsky and Moore are criticized for other (valid, I think) reasons (and sometimes criticized for unvalid reasons, I should add, but not really racial ones that I am aware of.  E.g. people making fun of Moore&#039;s weight is stupid, except with Team America did it, when it was cruelly but hysterically funny, and as a result of Moore trying to claim Parker and Stone had endorsed something of Moore&#039;s, when they had done no such thing).

Cosby should not have been subject to take that kind of flak for saying what he says just because he&#039;s black.  Or, that kind of flak should have been ridiculed by more people than, say, Patrick.  Also, Cosby shouldn&#039;t be subject to this because he&#039;s Cliff f****** Huxtable, but never mind that (I know what you are thinking, Ken, but Leonard 6 doesn&#039;t cancel that out).  Sure, if you want to argue the position, have at it.  I just like to think we can do that sort of thing without calling him an Uncle Tom.

I&#039;m certainly interested to hear what it was that Jackson the Elder said, though I suppose I can guess.  I&#039;m not sure I see reasonable room criticize Obama&#039;s position. Except that white folk could probably use a good dose of that advice too (but then presume this was addressed in a context where he was talking about black people so, ok, no biggie).  I don&#039;t think Obama was making some sort of &quot;all families must be of the nucular variety&quot; argument here.  That would seem out of character at least.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Chomsky and Moore are criticized for other (valid, I think) reasons (and sometimes criticized for unvalid reasons, I should add, but not really racial ones that I am aware of.  E.g. people making fun of Moore's weight is stupid, except with Team America did it, when it was cruelly but hysterically funny, and as a result of Moore trying to claim Parker and Stone had endorsed something of Moore's, when they had done no such thing).</p>
<p>Cosby should not have been subject to take that kind of flak for saying what he says just because he's black.  Or, that kind of flak should have been ridiculed by more people than, say, Patrick.  Also, Cosby shouldn't be subject to this because he's Cliff f****** Huxtable, but never mind that (I know what you are thinking, Ken, but Leonard 6 doesn't cancel that out).  Sure, if you want to argue the position, have at it.  I just like to think we can do that sort of thing without calling him an Uncle Tom.</p>
<p>I'm certainly interested to hear what it was that Jackson the Elder said, though I suppose I can guess.  I'm not sure I see reasonable room criticize Obama's position. Except that white folk could probably use a good dose of that advice too (but then presume this was addressed in a context where he was talking about black people so, ok, no biggie).  I don't think Obama was making some sort of "all families must be of the nucular variety" argument here.  That would seem out of character at least.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ezra</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/07/10/luke-1521/comment-page-1/#comment-5501</link>
		<dc:creator>Ezra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:16:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=1497#comment-5501</guid>
		<description>Well, Chomsky does get the self hating Jew tag a lot.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, Chomsky does get the self hating Jew tag a lot.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/07/10/luke-1521/comment-page-1/#comment-5499</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:13:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=1497#comment-5499</guid>
		<description>Of course. Jeremiah Wright is proof enough of that from the opposite end of things, and yet Chomsky and Moore aren&#039;t called sellouts or told they&#039;re &quot;not white enough&quot; by their critics either.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course. Jeremiah Wright is proof enough of that from the opposite end of things, and yet Chomsky and Moore aren't called sellouts or told they're "not white enough" by their critics either.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/07/10/luke-1521/comment-page-1/#comment-5498</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 17:01:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=1497#comment-5498</guid>
		<description>There&#039;s definitely some race-adds-credibility thinking going on when people react to Cosbyesque speeches.  (I remember, for example, the outpouring of white joy when a certain well-liked African-American actor suggested that Black History Month was a questionable idea.)  Yet the same people who would say &quot;we ought to accept what X has to say, or at least give it more credibility, because he&#039;s talking about his own ethnic group&quot; would generally not accept that proposition if we applied it elsewhere.  Whites nodding furiously along to Cosby are not going to concede that Chomsky or Moore must be right about white America because they are white.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There's definitely some race-adds-credibility thinking going on when people react to Cosbyesque speeches.  (I remember, for example, the outpouring of white joy when a certain well-liked African-American actor suggested that Black History Month was a questionable idea.)  Yet the same people who would say "we ought to accept what X has to say, or at least give it more credibility, because he's talking about his own ethnic group" would generally not accept that proposition if we applied it elsewhere.  Whites nodding furiously along to Cosby are not going to concede that Chomsky or Moore must be right about white America because they are white.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Grandy</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/07/10/luke-1521/comment-page-1/#comment-5496</link>
		<dc:creator>Grandy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Jul 2008 16:41:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.popehat.com/?p=1497#comment-5496</guid>
		<description>Maybe possibly</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maybe possibly</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Minified using disk: basic
Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Database Caching 1/11 queries in 0.015 seconds using disk: basic
Object Caching 393/394 objects using disk: basic

Served from: www.popehat.com @ 2012-02-12 10:45:47 -->
