The Prisoner Project

Television

Mike’s news last week concerning a remake of the classic 1967 British television show The Prisoner put me in a mind the other night to drag out my copy of the show on dvd. Though I’ve seen the show before now obviously, from watching the first episode I was hooked again. So I’ve decided, as time permits, to watch it and comment on the episodes here.

Why should I do this? By turns brilliant, baffling, and infuriating, The Prisoner is, in my humble opinion, the finest television program ever made, so far ahead of its time that today, over 40 years after the initial broadcast, it’s still ahead of the times, a show that makes Lost, which borrows liberally from The Prisoner, look as easy to figure out as Dora The Explorer.

In this post, the first of several, I’d like to go into detail as to what I love about this show, and why you should watch it. Although I’ll discuss the plot, it’s impossible spoil the show, because years after watching it for the first time, I still don’t know what it was about, nor does anyone except for the program’s creator, actor Patrick McGoohan.

What is The Prisoner? The story is the only simple element.

An international secret agent, played by McGoohan, resigns from his agency for reasons he won’t fully explain. But he knows too much, about something, and someone wants to know everything that he knows. He is abducted after handing in his resignation and taken to The Village, which may be a warehouse built by Them for People Who Knew Too Much, or may be a prison designed to hold one man, to have that information extracted. Virtually everything we know about the agent, who is never referred to by name, but only as Number Six, is told in the show’s opening title sequence:

From there, each episode of The Prisoner is an increasingly intricate battle between Number Six and the people who control The Village, as he attempts to preserve his secret, learn who his captors are (his own people? the Americans? the Russians? the Illuminati? someone worse?) and to escape, while they attempt to extract that information, through psychological torture, drugs, and manipulation, a cat and mouse game played out over seventeen episodes.

But have no fear, this is no gritty Dostoevskyan psychodrama set in a Gulag. It’s also whimsical, funny, and aesthetically one of the most beautiful shows ever televised, a riot of color which was filmed in one of the strangest places in the British isles, a real place known as Portmeirion, a mad architect’s successful attempt to build a renaissance Italian city in miniature in a forest on the border of England and Wales. You really should visit it sometime.

The show is also helped by the musical work of Ron Grainer, the television and film musician best known for composing the original theme of Doctor Who, the spooky synthesized version that ran over the opening “tunnel” credits during the Tom Baker years and earlier.

As for the cast, Patrick McGoohan is perfect as Number Six, the only character appearing in every episode. He’s suave, distinguished, British upper-middle class, and he knows how to wear clothes. As much a good British secret agent man as Sean Connery on the small screen, McGoohan was also a great television developer, but he never made anything this good again because he broke himself in studio battles getting The Prisoner made. The guest cast is equally fine, consisting of BBC and other British television and stage veterans playing the inhabitants of The Village, who may be fellow prisoners who have been converted or who all may be in on it, and, in each episode, a new Number Two, the person who runs The Village and leads the efforts to get information from its citizens.

The Prisoner is one of the most influential television shows ever made, though its influence extends more to the movies, comics, and geek culture (catchphrases like “I am not a number! I am a free man!”) than to television. You owe it to yourself to sit through it one time before you shuffle off this coil.

In the next post in this series, I’ll discuss the show’s first episode, Arrival, in which we learn a little more about who Number Six is, and how he came to The Village.

Last 5 posts by Patrick

10 Comments

10 Comments

  1. tgb  •  Jun 18, 2008 @10:17 am

    This is going to be fun, because my Prisoner geekiness extends to the same level that can be found around here in some for Star Wars or Star Trek.

    I disagree that’s it’s impossible to spoil, because people watching it for the first time are completely unaware of the location of The Village, who runs it, who Number 1 is, etc.

    As to your comment that No. 6 is the only character in every episode – wasn’t The Butler in every episode as well?

  2. gbasden  •  Jun 18, 2008 @10:32 am

    I’m really looking forward to this. :)

  3. Ken  •  Jun 18, 2008 @10:41 am

    This is a great gap in my geekery: I’ve never watched it. I will now.

  4. tgb  •  Jun 18, 2008 @10:47 am

    Ken, you’re in for a treat.

  5. Michael  •  Jun 18, 2008 @1:36 pm

    Really looking forward to reading your stuff on this, as you know it’s one of my all-time favorites as well.

  6. Patrick  •  Jun 18, 2008 @4:13 pm

    I’ll surely get details wrong tgb, my hellhound, as I don’t intend to refer to web resources during this experiment (except to steal their images, which they stole in turn), or anything except for my own memories of the show and recent viewing. I do anticipate and look forward to jousting or agreeing with you over what things mean (minutiae like “WAY OUT,” for instance), because in the end I know that neither of us knows.

    As you know very well, much of the fun in this show is figuring out for oneself what it all means and interpreting it all. I’ll offer my theories, and I’ll get facts wrong. Which is why I’m not concerned about spoiling, because I know that someone like Ken, who’s never seen it, will walk away with different conclusions.

    In the end, I know only two important things about this show for certain: that it’s one of the most discussionworthy shows ever made if not the most (and thanks!), and that no one, no one, should ever watch the last episode under the influence of seriously mind-altering chemicals. The first time I saw it, I watched under the influence of (prescribed) narcotics, and the memory still freaks me out.

  7. tgb  •  Jun 18, 2008 @5:07 pm

    I don’t mean to come off as the Ultimate Authority (in fact I will admit I was wrong about The Butler – he’s NOT in all the episodes). – but I have thought about this show a lot over the years, and have changed my opinion several times about a number of issues (I’ll leave what they are open for when we get into specific episodes).

    I still think it will be tough (for me, anyway) having watched the complete series 4 or 5 times now, not to indulge opinions that might serve as spoilers to Noobs like Ken

  8. Amy Sterling Casil  •  Jan 10, 2009 @2:25 pm

    NOOOOO Waaaaayy! I love the Prisoner. I have the complete set on DVD, which was super-expensive and I can’t believe I bought it for myself. Makes Lost – as easy to figure out as Dora the Explorer – LOL! This is an acquired taste, though. I know people who don’t “get it” and it’s pointless to try to make them like it.

    Who is Number One? Where are you? In the Village. I am not a number – I am a FREE MAN! and all that. And “rover.” Yes, I own The Prisoner Companion.

  9. Clay  •  Jan 10, 2009 @6:09 pm

    I’ve tried hard to follow Patrick’s tastes over the years – convinced, for dubious reasons, that they are superior to my own – and the Prisoner sold me in the first few episodes. Then it lost me. I never recaptured the feeling I had in those first few shows, and can’t pretend to rate the series overall very highly. I think, in the end, it was the feeling of someone trying to manipulate me (the writers and producers) who had no clue what buttons to push. I could see the strings, but they weren’t attached to the right joints. I could see that I was supposed to be afraid, or intrigued, or puzzled, or moved, and I just wasn’t. It became an academic exercise in the end; I could trace its contours and recognize an aesthetic appreciation for certain features, but at some point along the way it failed to affect me.

    Hold on a minute, I think my Dr. Who DVDs just arrived.

  10. Joe  •  Feb 13, 2009 @11:17 am

    Clay said it best — the quality and entertainment factor for me peaked early and started fizzling around episode 11. The fire was out by 15.

Leave a Reply

Allowed tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>