<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: FIRE Responds Regarding Condemnation vs. Censorship</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.popehat.com/2008/04/15/fire-responds-regarding-condemnation-vs-censorship/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/04/15/fire-responds-regarding-condemnation-vs-censorship/</link>
	<description>A Group Complaint about Law, Liberty, and Leisure</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 00:16:47 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jesse</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/04/15/fire-responds-regarding-condemnation-vs-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-2603</link>
		<dc:creator>Jesse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:37:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newpopehat.dreamhosters.com/?p=739#comment-2603</guid>
		<description>Damn it.  As an alum of the Colorado College, I now feel like I have to write a letter to my retarded dean ....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn it.  As an alum of the Colorado College, I now feel like I have to write a letter to my retarded dean &#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/04/15/fire-responds-regarding-condemnation-vs-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-2602</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:21:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newpopehat.dreamhosters.com/?p=739#comment-2602</guid>
		<description>Well Ken, in that event, let&#039;s suppose this had been a federal agency placing a reprimand in an employee&#039;s file concerning the employee&#039;s  publication of matters unrelated to his employment, a reprimand which would be seen by other federal agencies reviewing the file for determination of whether to hire this person.  Let&#039;s suppose the employee had published this silly newspaper on his own time, and it wound up in his file in a form accessible to other government agencies without considering federal privacy laws.  Let&#039;s suppose, when you were an AUSA, that Justice had reprimanded you and made the reprimand accessible to other agencies looking to hire you over something you&#039;d written on this blog that had nothing to do with your job.

Whaddya think, hoss?  Assuming you &lt;em&gt;really&lt;/em&gt; wanted to transfer to another agency, would that be a problem for you?  And by problem, I mean litigation.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well Ken, in that event, let&#8217;s suppose this had been a federal agency placing a reprimand in an employee&#8217;s file concerning the employee&#8217;s  publication of matters unrelated to his employment, a reprimand which would be seen by other federal agencies reviewing the file for determination of whether to hire this person.  Let&#8217;s suppose the employee had published this silly newspaper on his own time, and it wound up in his file in a form accessible to other government agencies without considering federal privacy laws.  Let&#8217;s suppose, when you were an AUSA, that Justice had reprimanded you and made the reprimand accessible to other agencies looking to hire you over something you&#8217;d written on this blog that had nothing to do with your job.</p>
<p>Whaddya think, hoss?  Assuming you <em>really</em> wanted to transfer to another agency, would that be a problem for you?  And by problem, I mean litigation.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ken</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/04/15/fire-responds-regarding-condemnation-vs-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-2600</link>
		<dc:creator>Ken</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:11:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newpopehat.dreamhosters.com/?p=739#comment-2600</guid>
		<description>I know you understand state action and do not think this instance is legally cognizable.  But since we were analyzing Colorado College&#039;s asshattery &lt;i&gt;as if&lt;/i&gt; it were governed by the First Amendment --- on the theory that universities should try to meet that standard, and be called out when they do not -- I understood you to be suggesting before that &lt;i&gt;if&lt;/i&gt; a state actor did this it should be considered legally cognizable punishment.  My apologies if I got it wrong.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I know you understand state action and do not think this instance is legally cognizable.  But since we were analyzing Colorado College&#8217;s asshattery <i>as if</i> it were governed by the First Amendment &#8212; on the theory that universities should try to meet that standard, and be called out when they do not &#8212; I understood you to be suggesting before that <i>if</i> a state actor did this it should be considered legally cognizable punishment.  My apologies if I got it wrong.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/04/15/fire-responds-regarding-condemnation-vs-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-2598</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 22:05:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newpopehat.dreamhosters.com/?p=739#comment-2598</guid>
		<description>Ken as you know I don&#039;t feel this to be a legally cognizable anything. I merely think it&#039;s morally wrong.  Mr. Bader may feel it to be something worthy of litigation, but I don&#039;t.

I don&#039;t say that to disparage or disagree with you, but simply because I&#039;m afraid that the one or two lawyers of personal acquaintance who read this blog might take away the impression that I believe a private university&#039;s asshattery is a violation of the First Amendment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ken as you know I don&#8217;t feel this to be a legally cognizable anything. I merely think it&#8217;s morally wrong.  Mr. Bader may feel it to be something worthy of litigation, but I don&#8217;t.</p>
<p>I don&#8217;t say that to disparage or disagree with you, but simply because I&#8217;m afraid that the one or two lawyers of personal acquaintance who read this blog might take away the impression that I believe a private university&#8217;s asshattery is a violation of the First Amendment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Condemnation is Not Censorship: The FIRE Gets it Wrong on Colorado College, The Monthly Bag, and Official Criticism &#124; Popehat</title>
		<link>http://www.popehat.com/2008/04/15/fire-responds-regarding-condemnation-vs-censorship/comment-page-1/#comment-2597</link>
		<dc:creator>Condemnation is Not Censorship: The FIRE Gets it Wrong on Colorado College, The Monthly Bag, and Official Criticism &#124; Popehat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 15 Apr 2008 21:55:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.newpopehat.dreamhosters.com/?p=739#comment-2597</guid>
		<description>[...] Update: Mr. Kissel has responded at The FIRE&#8217;s blog, as discussed here. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div style="padding: 5px 10px; background-color: #fffeeb; margin-right: -9px; margin-left: -12px; ">
<p>[...] Update: Mr. Kissel has responded at The FIRE&#8217;s blog, as discussed here. [...]</p>
</div>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
