Eugene Volokh alerts us to a Fifth Circuit decision which creates a split between the Fifth and Eleventh Circuits — exactly the sort of split that is more likely to lead to review by the Supreme Court. The issue: dildos, and the constitutionality of the banning advertising and promotion of the same.

It will be worth the price of admission to see the look on Thomas’ face.

What should also be reviewed: why isn’t it “dildi?” WordPress’ spell checker doesn’t like any plural. Oh, well.

Fear not, this post is a mere coincidence; we’re not becoming a sex device blog.

Last 5 posts by Ken

• In Which I Indulge In The Very Appalling Elitist Liberal Sneering That is Destroying America - August 27th, 2010
• Was That Wrong? Should We Not Have Done That? - August 27th, 2010
• A Less Perfect Union - August 27th, 2010
• SPEECH Act A Bulwark Against Buffoonish Brits - August 27th, 2010
• Anatomy Of A Toner Scam - August 26th, 2010